China Reshapes The World

Narcissism’s Terrifying Vision

… half of China may well have to die.

Mao Zedung

While the spectre of communism, which so haunted the twentieth century, has largely receded, it still retains its oppressive power in the world’s most populous nation, China. And whereas Stalin’s Communist Party was dissolved in ignominy following the demise of the Soviet Union, the party of Mao has become one of the most powerful governments in the world.

Both Stalin and Mao suffered from multiple personality disorders, including psychopathology, narcissistic personality disorder and paranoid personality disorder. The dominant characteristic differed between the two, however, as evidenced by their behaviour and the nature of their regimes. Stalin’s character and regime were heavily marked by his severe paranoia, which was given free reign by his absence of conscience. The endless pre-emptive massacres of those he feared would become a threat – such as prisoners released from the Gulag, potential collaborators prior to the outbreak of World War II, and the entire Politburo at the time of Lenin’s death – demonstrate a man living in a continuous state of hyper-attentive fear, constantly conjuring up enemies for annihilation.

Mao too exhibited all three dangerous personality disorders, but with Mao the balance was skewed more heavily towards narcissism than was the case with Stalin. Mao also appears to have derived greater personal pleasure from extreme violence than Stalin. Without doubt Stalin enjoyed the fact that others suffered and died at his hands. Mao, however, found it exhilarating. When he first witnessed torture and murder at the age of thirty-four, Mao reported that he had felt ‘a kind of ecstasy never experienced before.[1]

Mao’s writings when he was still in his twenties give a chilling insight into the mind of someone with this terrifying combination of personality disorders. Describing his outlook on morality three decades before he rose to power, he wrote, ‘I do not agree with the view that to be moral, the motive of one’s action has to be benefiting others. Morality does not have to be defined in relation to others… People like me want to … satisfy our hearts to the full and in doing so we automatically have the most valuable moral codes. Of course there are people and objects in the world, but they are all there only for me.[2]’ Alongside the extreme egotism expressed here, it is telling that Mao makes no distinction whatsoever between people and things. This is because in the minds of people with psychopathic personalities there is no distinction. For Mao, as for psychopaths in general, mass killing of human individuals had the same emotional impact as casting wood on a fire.

Mao’s musings on his love of violence also reflect his psychopathic inability to conceptualise the suffering that violence inflicts on others. In Mao’s disordered mind, extreme violence was simply something to indulge in to satisfy his narcissistic fantasies and relieve the boredom he would suffer in a peaceful world. ‘Long-lasting peace is unendurable to human beings,’ he wrote. ‘When we look at history, we adore the times of [war] when dramas happened one after another… which make reading about them great fun. When we get to periods of peace and prosperity, we are bored…[3]’ Once again Mao is incapable of making any distinction between reading about war as an abstract occurrence and actually bringing about the deaths of millions of people.

Relations Between Wolves

On the one hundred and tenth anniversary of Mao’s birth in 2004, a group of dissidents wrote a letter entitled ‘An Appeal for the Removal of the Corpse of Mao Zedong from Beijing’. In it they wrote[4], ‘Mao instilled in people’s minds a philosophy of cruel struggle and revolutionary superstition. Hatred took the place of love and tolerance; the barbarism of ‘It is right to rebel!’ became the substitute for rationality and love of peace. It elevated and sanctified the view that relations between human beings are best characterised as those between wolves.’ The reform of China’s political system, from its current pathological ‘relations between wolves’ towards democracy is necessary. It is necessary to safeguard not only the citizens of the world’s most populous nation, it is needed to safeguard us all.

Continue reading Chapter 4 here on the Crisis of the West or go to my blog here to read how democracy can protect us from pathological elites.


[1] Quoted in Jung Chang and Jon Halliday, Mao: The unknown story, Vintage, 2006:42

[2] Ibid:13

[3] Quoted in Jung Chang and Jon Halliday, Mao: The unknown story, Vintage, 2006:14

[4] Quoted in Richard McGregor, The Party: The secret world of China’s Communist Rulers, Allen Lane, 2010:246

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “China Reshapes The World

  1. As it stands in this excerpt, your analysis of Mao’s analysis of war as an antidote to boredom doesn’t adequately support your conclusion, though I do believe the quote itself shows some troubling signs in his psyche. The idea he is presenting is somewhat common, however, and therefore should receive some wider consideration for its implications as an idea rooted in the collective psyche, even though it’s true Mao elevated as a rationale for his policies.

    • Mao’s desire for war runs deeper I believe than a desire to relieve boredom. In common with psychopaths such as Hitler, Mao delighted in war in the same way that a boy would delight in playing an imaginary game of conquest. Because psychopaths are incapable of attributing value to other human beings, Mao did not distinguish between his fantasy of constant violence and the reality that such violence would cause immense suffering for others. The deaths of millions of people had zero emotional impact upon him.

  2. You have a good grasp of a few of the various personality disorders. Even the most minor one, histrionic personality disorder, is characterized by two pervasive desires: (1) to get their way, and/or (2) to fight.

  3. Fascinating! Did not know that about Mao. No surprise, of course.

    Re: Stalin’s paranoia, and the general distinction between narcissistic, psychopathic, and paranoid personalities — I’d say (and do, in the article below) that paranoia is pretty much an inevitable consequence of the narcissistic and psychopathic (but especially the former) developmental arrest.

    And the greater the power reach of the narcissistic psychopath in question, the greater — both more encompassing and stronger — his paranoid outlook becomes. There is a reason why all these genocidal tyrants hire food tasters, sooner than later.

    View story at Medium.com

    P.S. “Both Stalin and Mao suffered from multiple personality disorders, including psychopathology, narcissistic personality disorder and paranoid personality disorder.”

    I’m guessing you meant to say “psychopathy” rather than “psychopathology” here, correct?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s